A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On August 2012, the Defendant stated that “F”-type restaurant operated by the Defendant in Busan Shipping Daegu, which was the part of the said restaurant, was the victim G who was the part of the said restaurant “F,” and the Defendant’s payment of the expenses is the benefit to F even if the Defendant paid interest, rather than paying the benefits, etc. with the F’s property in Japan due to the phenomenon of the United Nations, rather than paying the benefits, etc. with the F’s property in Korea. It is the benefit to F. Around 10% per annum and at any time, the Defendant borrowed the money to be repaid if he/she wishes to pay the money at any time.”

However, in fact, the F restaurant in Japan at the time is a business entity having no direct relations with the Defendant. Meanwhile, the FF's operation was not only for each month's business, but also for the employee's benefits. Furthermore, the F was responsible for the loans of savings banks equivalent to KRW 70 million, an average of KRW 50,000,000 per month, and the credit card was also under economic circumstances to the extent that it should be tentatively changed by a majority of the credit card, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay money from the victim even if it was borrowed money from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 180 million from the victim to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant, including KRW 50 million on August 14, 2012 and KRW 130 million on October 4, 2012 and KRW 180 million on October 4, 2012.

B. The victim is from the defendant the above 1-A.

On July 22, 2013, Busan District Court Decision 2013Kadan1844, which was operated by the Defendant, decided on the provisional seizure of claim amounting to KRW 10 million against six card companies, including HCS Co., Ltd.

The Defendant from July 2013 to the same year.

8. The provisional seizure shall be effected against the victim at the same place as the statement in the preceding paragraph.