logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.31 2017고정2946
과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2017, the Defendant was in the middle of 2 matatat 11:00 on July 20, 2017, at the entrance of the Yaeung-gu B apartment house C Dong and D, which he had placed, in the middle of the mountain.

One of the aforesaid mats is a wild satatatus (hereinafter “the instant matat dog”), which had been asked by attacking other return dogs in a mountain two times prior to the death, and there was a verbal warning to the apartment residents’ port and the apartment management office’s duty to take safety measures.

As such, there was a possibility that the instant medical dog could cause damage, such as injury, to the owner of the return dog, in the event of an attack on another person's return dog due to wild character.

Therefore, the Defendant, the main owner of the instant dust dog, has a duty of care to wear and put a fat dog and a single fat line, which can prevent the occurrence of danger, as safety measures to prevent the occurrence of danger.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty of care by wearing the instant medical dog without wearing the fat dog, wearing the general fat, wearing the fat, putting it on the fat, and neglecting his duty of care. In the course of attacking the victim E (the victim fat 44 years old, female) with the fat to the fat dog, the Defendant fated the victim’s fat with the fat dog in the course of attacking the victim’s fat to the fat dog, or fat the victim’s face, right hand, and the victim’s fat to the fat dog in the course of defending the victim’s fat to protect the fat dog’s fat, and caused injury to the victim.

To the extent that the facts charged and the basic facts are identical and are not likely to substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, specific facts are partially recognized differently from those charged.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness E and F, respectively.

arrow