logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.23 2015고단2211
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 2211"

1. On April 13, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, Road Traffic Act, and Automobile Compensation Guarantee Act: (a) on April 13, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was driving a vehicle while driving a C M& car not covered by mandatory insurance in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.203% in front of the bus terminal located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City at the end of 607-3 (on a year without any delay) on the road; (c) while driving the vehicle, he was negligent in driving the vehicle due to negligence while neglecting the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of duty to safely drive the vehicle; and (d) the Defendant was able to repair the bus in the front part of the bus owned by Defendant 287 and 80 won due to the shock of the vehicle.

"2015 Highest 2722"

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act.

On May 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.127% from blood alcohol level around 23:40, and driven the said car at a speed of 0.127%, and driven the four-lane road in front of the length-distance from the center of the U.S. C. C., which is located under the direction of the C.Y., at the right edge of the U.S. to the center of the U.S., a speed of about 50km at a speed, depending on one lane.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle after checking the safety in the course of driving without drinking alcohol and driving the motor vehicle well.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim F(61) who was under the influence of a signal waiting at the front of the passenger car, due to the negligence of neglecting this, and was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the passenger car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant is above.

arrow