1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking non-permission of extension of sojourn period, etc. and cancellation of departure order. The first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing the instant lawsuit on March 28, 2016. The Plaintiff only appealed against the non-permission decision of extension of sojourn period, etc. stated in the purport of the claim and the non-permission decision of extension of sojourn period, etc. during departure order, and filed an appeal. Accordingly, the subject of the judgment by the court is limited to the non-permission decision of extension of sojourn period, etc

2. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 9, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a marriage report with B who is a national of the Republic of Korea on March 9, 2006, and on April 19, 2006, the qualification for residence (F-2) granted to the spouse of the citizen at the time of marriage (F-2) was currently separated from that of marriage immigration (F-6).

entry into Korea.

B. On November 15, 2006, the Plaintiff was married with B on November 15, 2006, and obtained the status of alteration of status of alteration of status (F-1 March 13, 2007) in the capacity of visit Dong (F-1) on December 13, 2006.

C. On June 9, 2008, after about one year and three months from the expiration date of the above period of sojourn, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming consolation money (the claimed amount of five million won, the Suwon District Court Branch Branch Branch of 2008ddan4995) against B, which was about one year and three months, and filed an application for permission to extend the period of stay on June 11, 2008.

Accordingly, around that time, the defendant imposed a disposition of notice of a penalty of KRW 2 million on the plaintiff on the ground of the above illegal stay, and allowed the plaintiff to stay in other (G-1) qualifications.

On July 2, 2009, the above lawsuit of consolation money claim was rendered in favor of the plaintiff by public notice, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 22, 2009.

After that, the Plaintiff was staying in the status of residence (F-2-1) on July 31, 2009, and obtained the status of alteration of status of sojourn as a visiting agent (F-1-6) for family settlement on July 17, 2012. On June 14, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for permission of naturalization and obtained the status of alteration of status of sojourn as a visiting agent (F-1-7) qualification on the ground of this on June 17, 2013.

The plaintiff approximately 1 year.