All judgment of the first instance court shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, November 20, 2006.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts1) Of the cases of 2013 Gohap103, the fact that each fraud was committed on December 22, 2010, 201, January 10, 2011, and February 15, 2011, the Defendant directly prepared each monetary loan contract, not only did the Defendant account but also did not participate in the act of defraudation because he was remitted loans to the temporary bank account in the name of AI, not the Defendant’s account. 2) On November 20, 2006, the fraud was committed by the Defendant on November 20, 2006, and the Defendant acquired KRW 300 million from AK by means of deception around April 2007, and instead acquired KRW 300,000 from AK to take part in the expenses of parliamentary operation, but also provided the Defendant with the above KRW 100,000,000,000 for the payment of KRW 700,015.

C) On April 31, 2011, the Defendant did not have prepared a real estate lease agreement under the name of AK and each acquisition contract for lease deposit under the name of AK, and the Defendant did not have used it to present it to the employees in charge of W Group, and this is a period between AK and W Group Y. 3) the case ( February 28, 2007; 12, July 12, 2007; 2007; 2007. Each fraud on August 8, 2007; 2007; 31, Jan. 31, 208; 2008; 3) the Defendant obtained a loan from the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Solomon Mutual Savings Bank, etc. on January 31, 2008; and the Defendant used the loan by deceiving or deceiving the Defendant by means of a forgery of the loan agreement, loan agreement, etc. in the name of the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation or the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation.

4) 2013 Highest 5809 case A).