logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.19 2017가합563804
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of brush, storage, and distribution of medicine. The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling pharmaceutical products and non-pharmaceutical drugs. 2) On January 13, 2009, the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of goods (hereinafter “the first supply contract”) with the Plaintiff on January 13, 200, and accordingly, entered into a contract for the supply of goods (hereinafter “Cump, Dump, Eump, Fump, Gump, Hump and Hump” and “the second supply contract for goods (hereinafter “the second supply contract”) on June 1, 2015, and entered into a contract for the supply of goods (hereinafter “each of the instant goods supply contract”) with the Plaintiff on June 1, 2015, and accordingly, entered into an agreement for the promotion of mutual cooperation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Defendant on May 31, 201 (hereinafter “the instant standards agreement”).

(4) After November 17, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the transfer or acquisition of marketing approval (report) of IP, EP, DP, DP, JP, FP, KP, HP, and GP, and directly manufactured the foregoing dental items (hereinafter “instant contract for transfer of license”).

B. The so-called “N” case 1) M members of the National Assembly belonging to L party are N on September 26, 2016 (hereinafter “N”).

) The report was published that CMF/MIT (mix of CMITs/MITs suspected of being the cause of the damage caused by humidifier disinfectants (mix of CITs) manufactured and supplied chemical products MICLIN S490, which were added to a breathic solution, and the O et al. produced and distributed the chemical product as a raw material to O et al. In the media thereafter, the media made a report, and the media spreads unstable fear that hazardous substances are distributed during the market (hereinafter referred to as “PPS case”).

(ii) 2.

arrow