Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to the defendant B, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are the joint owners who operate Busan-gu E as the father's land.

“Maotoma 2” Game machine is a game machine rated as a whole for use by the Game Rating Board in accordance with the game users’ ability, if it is discovered that another forest is different from the other two among the three pictures shown on the screen and then is found through a method of discharging not more than 5,000 won, if it is found to be a different forest during the seven-stage period.

No person shall provide game products for the distribution or use of the contents different from those of the rating, or display or keep such products for such purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendants from May 10, 2012 to the same year.

7. From November 11, 13:50, the game machine was classified as a part of the prize and the winning, regardless of the game user’s choice, regardless of the contents as classified by the Game Rating Board, and the game machine was selected in some sections, but the answer was not processed, and the answer was selected in other sections, and the answer was not processed, and the user’s ability was selected only, and the answer was provided to unspecified customers who visited the said “E” 10 game game machine to the extent that the user’s ability does not affect the game proceeding.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the grade.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against F, G, or H;

1. Investigation report (written replys as a result of appraisal of games);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. The Defendants: Article 45 subparag. 4 and Article 32(1)2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, and the choice of a sentence

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Confession and reflect);

1. Defendants: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act