logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.03.27 2020고단87
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 12, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the support for the Jeonju Military and Mountain Villages, etc. on November 12, 2009. Around 07:00 on December 14, 2019, the Defendant driven a CW car under the influence of alcohol 0.106% of blood alcohol concentration at the section of about 70km from the section of about 0.106 meters of alcohol concentration to the Agricultural bridge, juk-gun, Jincheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on traffic accident 1 and 2 (Report on Actual Yellow Dust);

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. A copy of an investigation report (verification of the same kind of power), and a copy of each judgment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, copies of written judgments, and current status of accommodation of individuals;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The following circumstances are considered to be a repeated crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, such as the fact that it is a repeated crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, the driving of a considerably long distance on an expressway in the drinking condition, and the fact that there was a history of causing a traffic accident during driving at around 2009, and that there is a history of punishment for the occurrence of a traffic accident during driving at around the time of drinking, but it is reasonable to see that the previous company fee and the previous company fee and the previous company fee and 23:00, it seems that the resolution of the lodging would be less than that of the drinking water in this case, and that there is no punishment for the same kind

In this regard, all the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, behavior and environment, are determined as above.

arrow