1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 5, 201, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on August 26, 201, as an alien of the nationality of the Republic of Rotten (hereinafter referred to as "Man").

The Defendant, on December 26, 2012, “a well-founded fear of persecution” (amended by the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 17, 2013, but the said objection was dismissed on October 22, 2013.

[Based on recognition, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to Gap evidence 1-1, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 1-2, and the purport of the entire pleading, and whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, was admitted to a political party under the name of "B", the main field of Nanman (hereinafter “B”) around 2008.

B is a political party that holds a demonstration requiring the democratization of the state and is under the pressure of the state.

On September 28, 2009, the assembly and demonstration, which demanded the democratization of Nice in the stadiums located in the water cokera, was held under the initiative of B. In the process of suppressing this, the situation, such as the military personnel's capture to the demonstration team, has occurred.

On November 2009, the United Nations dispatched an investigation team to investigate the above situation, and the plaintiff who participated in the above demonstration testified to the United Nations Investigation Team at the time of the demonstration.

The government is continuing to engage in carbon pressure with regard to those who participated in the above coscisc demonstration as well as party members.

On November 2009, soldiers found the gap that the plaintiff did not have any plaintiff and the plaintiff's family members threatened because the plaintiff participated in the Cornac Demonstration and gave testimony to the United Nations Investigation Team.