The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant: (a) was a male-parent body of the victim B; (b) the victim had sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s her own friend and drinking while drinking the Defendant’s friend with the Defendant; and (c) had such fact known to the neighbors of the victimized party; and (d) on March 20, 2017, on the Internet site page’s account and the victim’s friend to comments on the Internet site’s friends account and the victim’s friends account; and (c) had friended from to to the victim’s friends, despite the fact that the friends are going back by the victim’s friends, the Defendant

I.

Although it is not directly followed, it is necessary to think that she will be able to go on.

The author came to know, where we look at her hertory and see, where on the Internet.

In the situation of sex assault is not a snick, and in this situation, where the sex assault is sexually married, the sex assault is sexually married;

From the time to time, the phrase "Ixax Stockholmn, where 777 men's sexual assault was made," was written from the point of time, "Ixa, not Stockholm, where women777 women's sexual intercourse were sexually sexually sexually ill," and damaged the reputation of the victim through the information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

2. Applicable to the facts charged for judgment: A judgment dismissing a victim's non-prosecution of punishment after the prosecution is instituted pursuant to Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).