The Defendant is innocent. The Defendant is dismissed in all of the instant medical treatment and custody request and attachment order request.

Judgment of the accused case

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the Defendant and the applicant for a medical treatment and custody attachment order and the applicant for an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the “defendant”) are the students aged 18 years old who are enrolled in the first half of the second grade of the D School, which is a special school.

On December 3, 2014, at around 16:06, the Defendant discovered the Victim G (1) who had been entered several times in the vicinity of the 3rd floor Ethic corridor located in Busan, the Defendant got her grandchildren and went back to the door of the outdoor stairs located at the end of the third floor, and the mother of the victim, H, who was the mother of the victim, was followed by the Defendant on account of his own danger.

around that time, the Defendant opened the above entrance that was not corrected by the victim, and the mother of the victim, the mother of the victim, “I do not do so” to the effect that the victim would return the victim to the victim. In order to find the victim back by hand, the Defendant and the victim were fluored with the victim.

The Defendant: (a) taken the mind of murdering the victim of the instant accident on the 3rd outdoor emergency stairs rail; (b) taken the victim by hand on the 9.2ms below the 9.2m of outdoor stairs of the said 3rd floor; (c) taken the victim with the thropologic typosis, and suffered the victim with the thropologic typosis; and (d) around 21:22 of the same day, the victim had the victim died during the treatment in the Gannam University Gancheon-ro, Seocheon-ro, Busan.

Accordingly, the Defendant murdered the victim by the above method.

2. Summary of the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion

A. The main part of the facts charged in the instant case is based on the victim’s statement, both on the victim’s mother, and the interrogation conducted in the course of investigation into the Defendant is in fact the Defendant’s mother, and thus, the Defendant’s testimony is not guilty on the ground that the facts charged in the instant case constitutes a case where

B. Even if there is evidence of the crime of this case.