logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.05 2018누45963
체류기간 연장 등 불허가 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "No. 17 of April 10, 2015" in the 4th Do table of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "No. 2015"; "applicant and 10 of the 6th Do table" shall be "the plaintiff"; "No. 13 of the 13th Do" shall be "the plaintiff"; "applicant" shall be "the plaintiff"; "the 18th Claimant" shall be "the plaintiff"; and "the plaintiff shall be cited" shall be as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following judgments with regard to the matters alleged in the court of first instance, and shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff asserts that the disposition of this case was unlawful since the defendant permitted the extension of the period of sojourn to the plaintiff several times and did not permit the extension of the period of sojourn for the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case is unlawful on the sole ground of the plaintiff's assertion. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow