1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

On February 1, 2018, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff insured vehicle A, at a place of 00:40 on February 1, 2018 at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff vehicle”) was under direct control of the above intersection to a yellow flickering signal in the direction of the oil elementary school at the inner middle school, and the insured vehicle of the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) was under direct control of the above intersection without temporarily suspending the red flickering signal from the south Madraststle to the upper village at the right side of the Defendant vehicle. However, the above intersection and the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle and the front part of the Defendant vehicle adjacent to the right side of the Defendant vehicle conflict with each other, after deducting the insurance money paid by the Plaintiff until February 13, 2018, the remaining amount returned, 470,000,000 won of the returned vehicle from the inner middle school, the victim’s 1 to 70,00,70, and 1005, etc.

2. The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle who violated the red on-and-off signal, and that the plaintiff, the insurer of the plaintiff vehicle, subrogated the insurer to claim compensation for damages on the basis of subrogation against the insurer as to the damages incurred by the damage of the plaintiff vehicle (the amount of heavy notice) to the extent of the damage caused by the damage of the plaintiff vehicle. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff, as the driver of the plaintiff vehicle, should proceed to the intersection of the yellow on-and-off signal while proceeding to the intersection of the yellow on-and-off signal, and that there was an excessive fault without considering the surrounding circumstances, even though it is necessary to proceed to the view of other traffic.

The defendant also has the place of the accident of this case.