Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the candidate for medical treatment and custody is dismissed.

1. On February 1, 1983, the court below rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor's request regarding the case of the defendant and the part of the medical treatment and custody case, and on which only the defendant and the requester for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter "defendant") appealed from the part of the case of the attachment order, and therefore, despite Article 9 (8) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders as there is no benefit in appeal as to the part of the attachment order, the court below's scope of the party member's appeal is excluded from the scope of this court's judgment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 82Do2823, 82Do611, Jan. 18, 1983).

3. Determination

A. As to the part of the case of the defendant, E and F, a child between the victim and the defendant, wanting to take the Defendant’s front seat, the defendant does not have the criminal power, except three times of fine due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the crime of this case was committed in a state that the defendant committed the crime of this case under the state that the defendant suffered from the e-mail disorder on the damaged network and lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions, which are favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant was killed due to the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

The age, criminal records and other offenses of the defendant.