logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.09.26 2018나26666
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and this is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

2. The 11th judgment of the first instance that has been mixed shall consist of the 12th to 17th judgment as follows:

“A. The court may determine an amount of damages deemed reasonable by comprehensively taking into account all relevant indirect facts, such as the relationship between the parties revealed by the results of examination of evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings, the background leading up to the occurrence of property damage, the nature of damage, and various circumstances after the occurrence of damage, even though specific damage was found to have occurred in a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages due to tort (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 202-2; 2014Da27425, Sept. 26, 2017). In this case, the fact that the game of this case was destroyed due to the negligence by a judicial police officer or the prosecutor in charge of the Ulsan East-dong Police Station or the prosecutor in charge, and the Plaintiff suffered property damage equivalent to the market price of the game of this case.” The court made a statement to the effect that “The Korea Environment Corporation made an inquiry about the fact that the game of this case was destroyed,” 100Da416, Oct. 14, 200, 2004.”

arrow