logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.21 2015고합1192
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

326,238,00 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violating the defense justice is a person operating the F Co., Ltd. F (hereinafter “F”) for the purpose of feed sales business, etc. in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 805 stories 805.

G is the H representative from around 2008 to March 2014, who is a person representing I with respect to duties related to livestock economy such as business related to livestock economy, and who is deemed a public official for the management and supervision of business affairs of subsidiaries such as J(hereinafter “J”) of H, and the Defendant is the motive of K University Livestock Law No. 69.

L is a person who supplies a container with feed added to J while operating M, etc., which is a feed supplier.

L's supply volume to the contact with L was supplied from 6 to 8 tons a month since 2008 and began to reduce the supply volume as 2 tons a month from January 2009.

On April 2009, the Defendant decreased the volume of the container supplied to J by L.

J In order to maintain or increase the quantity of the goods to be supplied to the container, 750 won per kg shall be offered to H-related persons, such as G, for solicitation or good offices.

“A request to the effect that the request was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant would increase the supply volume to L to the maximum extent by talking about G's University Dong-dong and G.

“The supply and volume of the container” in fact to G has been recommended to increase the supply and volume of the container, and thereafter the supply volume of the container has increased up to 16 tons per month.

The Defendant received KRW 326,238,00 in total over 42 times from around that time to September 5, 2012, including the receipt of KRW 5,456,00 in return for the above solicitation or arrangement. From around that time, the Defendant received KRW 326,238,00 in addition to the list of crimes (1) in addition to the previous list of crimes.

As a result, the defendant received 326,238,00 won under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for the affairs handled by a person who is deemed a public official.

2. The defendant violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) is the victim F (hereinafter "victim F).

arrow