beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.
However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment has become final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A On June 24, 201, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 2 years to imprisonment for a violation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act, etc. A, and the judgment was finalized on December 14, 201, and on October 12, 2012, sentenced to imprisonment for four months and one year of suspension of execution, which was final and conclusive on October 20, 201. The judgment was sentenced to imprisonment for four months and one year of suspension of execution on May 24, 2013, and became final and conclusive on June 1, 201, by imprisonment for a violation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act, with prison labor for one year and six months at the Central District Court on April 30, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 8, 2014.
Defendant
B On April 30, 2014, the District Court rendered a two-year suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the District Court on October, 2014, which became final and conclusive on May 8, 2014.
Defendant
A from around 1997, from around 1997, he operated the E Cemetery located in Sincheon-si, and the Defendants have operated and managed the E Cemetery jointly from around 2002.
The Defendants were urged to sell the graveyard to the public without notifying the public of the fact that the graveyard did not obtain permission from the competent authorities.
On May 15, 2007, the Defendants made a false statement with the victim F at the E Graveyard office, stating that “The Defendants would rent 6 E Graveyards to the victim F.”
However, due to the absence of permission from the competent authorities, it was a situation in which it was impossible to lease the graveyard normally to the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendants received KRW 9,500,000 from the victim as the same day rent.
From around that time to April 7, 2010, the Defendants received a total of KRW 253,310,000 from 22 victims by the aforementioned means, as shown in the attached list of crimes.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to induce victims and received property from the victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The police statement concerning G;
1. F.O.T.