The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. There is no fact that the defendant received money of the same amount as that stated in the facts charged from the victims, or that the victim deceivings the victims to acquire it.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) The defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is found to be based on evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① victim E, L, M made a statement to the effect that it conforms to the facts charged at the investigative agency and court of the court below. The statement is consistent and consistent, ② around March 15, 2010 between the defendant and the victim E, giving the victim E a subcontract for aggregate transport work performed by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation Renovation Project Bureau in connection with the Sungnam-si and the Urban Residential Environment Improvement Project within the Jung-gu, Sungnam-gu, and giving the victim E a subcontract for the above transport work, subject to the performance of the above transport work, the victim E paid KRW 25 million to the defendant on March 15, 2010, around the end of March 25, 2010, and around 25 million won, ③ the above agreement was made with the victim's authority to transport the aggregate at the time of the execution of the above transport work, and the defendant did not know the above facts.