logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.26 2017고정1374
상해
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is an overseas Korean (F-4) who is eligible to stay with Chinese nationality, and the expiration date of his/her stay is February 7, 2019 and B president.

Victim C(31) is a job (E-7) who is eligible to stay in Chinese nationality, and the expiration date of his stay was March 6, 2024, and the employee B was at the time of the case.

On January 22, 2017, the Defendant, at around 21:00 on January 22, 2017, did not assist the Defendant in finishing business on the ground that the victim was easy at Yongsan-gu and B’s accommodation in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and B, followed by one minute of the Plaintiff’s left eye and walked with one hand.

Defendant continued to have the victim escaped after going outside the air-conditioner room of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building E, and followed by hiding it.

Due to a bad hand, the victim's head debt knife and the victim's head knife knife 3 and 4 times, and the victim's head knife knife knife knife knife knife the victim's head knife.

2. 피고인 및 변호인의 주장 요지 피고인은 마감업무를 도우라며 B 지하에 누워 있던 피해자를 발로 한 번 툭 치고, 그 상 체를 잡아끌었으며, 이후 피해자가 도망가자 따라가 화단에 숨어 있던 피해자의 옷을 잡은 적이 있기는 하다.

However, as stated in the facts charged, the defendant does not face the victim's head by cutting off the victim's neck or face the victim's head. The victim's standing is caused by the victim's self-harm.

3. In the instant case, there is no investigation into other persons who observed the dispute between the Defendant and the victim, and eventually, the court below’s judgment on the credibility of the victim’s statement should be based on the credibility of the victim’s statement.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly investigated and adopted by this court, the testimony by the victim's investigative agency was proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt by the judge that the defendant injured the victim as stated in the facts charged.

see. see. .

arrow