logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.22 2016가합200068
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 484,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from August 18, 2015 to January 13, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A Co., Ltd. (after the change to B; hereinafter referred to as “A”) intended to sell the said project site upon request from E who operates D, around July 2013, while promoting the apartment development project of the instant site of land C (hereinafter referred to as “instant project site”).

B. From April 2014, the Plaintiff introduced the instant project site via the foregoing E while advertising the construction implementation business and the site for real estate development business with G that operates the F Company from around April 2014.

C. After reviewing the feasibility of the apartment development project on the instant project site, the Plaintiff and the above G (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) tried to directly purchase the right to develop apartment and its site (hereinafter “instant project zone and project site”) and promote the implementation of the apartment construction project. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff discussed the first and trust problems of the Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Asset Trust”), which will be in charge of trust on the said project site, and discussed the first and trust issues.

On July 10, 2014, the Plaintiff, upon receiving a trust deed from the I of the Korea Asset Trust, drafted a MO on July 16, 2014 to purchase the instant business right and the project site from the I of the Korea Asset Trust.

E. However, after the end of 2014, the Plaintiff determined that it is unreasonable for the Plaintiff to directly conduct the implementation project due to the problem of redemption of the secured debt established on the instant project site by the end of the end of 2014.

F. From that point of view, the Plaintiff came to know of the Defendant and agreed on the purchase of the instant project and the project site. On August 11, 2014, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with the service that allows the Plaintiff to acquire the instant project and the project site, and the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 800,000 as remuneration.

arrow