1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Plaintiff entered into a goods supply contract with the Defendant and supplied temporary materials to the scene of the construction of the Daejeon Seongbuk-gu A neighborhood living facilities between July 2013 and December, 201, but the Defendant did not pay KRW 33,00,000,000.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant is a party to a contract for the supply of temporary materials, and claims for the price of goods under a contract, the Plaintiff supplied temporary materials, etc. to the said new construction site as performed by the Defendant, and the Plaintiff is recognized as having issued a tax invoice in the future with the Defendant’s approval.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the witness B’s testimony and the statement in the evidence No. 1, namely, the Defendant subcontracted the construction of reinforced concrete to Nonparty B in relation to the said new construction work, that is, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff, who was known at ordinary times for this part of the construction work, to supply the temporary materials, and the Defendant did not participate in the selection of the temporary materials delivery company, and the Plaintiff cannot issue a tax invoice in his name because B was an individual person without registration of the business, and the Plaintiff was issued a tax invoice in his name, and there was no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff concluded the temporary materials supply contract with the Defendant.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.