The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter Cargo Vehicles.

On December 11, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 15:00 and became a parking problem on the road in front of C in Ansan-si, without a vehicle from the front D in front of C in Ansan-si, and became a passenger E and the victim F (math 60 years of age, south) and vision.

At this time, since the victim was unsatisfying with the defendant's vehicle's driver's seat, the defendant was obliged to take care of whether the victim was at a safe location before starting the vehicle and to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and left the victim's left side in front of the driver's seat in front of the Defendant's vehicle due to the negligence of the Defendant's failure to leave the road, and the victim of play gets out of the road after deducting the left side.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during approximately six weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim “rest of reflective fluoral fluoral fluor in the direction of the s

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since the victim submitted a written agreement to this court on September 10, 2020 after the institution of the prosecution and expressed his/her intent that he/she would not be punished, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article