1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part to be mard;

A. On the third 18th 19th 18th 3th 18th 18th 18th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 7,9 through 15th 7th 15 of A.

B. On September 2, 2016, the part of the first instance judgment, i.e., “(9 pages. . 9)” was amended as follows. In the end of the contract (hereinafter “the lease agreement of September 29, 2016”), the phrase “as long as there is no special reason, one year is extended, and the subsequent monthly rent is KRW 2.5 million.”

Accordingly, the above lease contract was renewed for a period of one year from October 1, 2017.

A person shall be appointed.

3. The addition;

A. The following shall be added between the fourth and nine pages of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The Plaintiff asserts that Defendant B expressed his/her intent to refuse the renewal of the lease agreement around August 3, 2018, which was the end of the renewed lease agreement until September 30, 2018, as above. However, even if considering the evidence No. 15, Defendant B did not agree to ensure the Plaintiff’s transfer of business regarding the instant store, it is in accordance with the content of the contract, and it does not appear to have expressed his/her intent to not renew the lease agreement.

In addition, the lessor, who is the co-owner of the commercial building to which the Commercial Building Lease Act applies, notifies the lessee of the rejection of the renewal in accordance with Article 10(4) of the same Act shall be jointly owned, such as the cancellation of the lease contract substantially.