logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.05.13 2019고단3172
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2019 Highest 3172] The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with B investment vehicle.

On February 9, 2019, at around 02:55, the Defendant driven the said car, and changed the two-lane road in front of the C apartment of the Manyang-gu Manyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City into one-lane in order to make a Uton while driving the two-lanes of the said road at the c apartment distance slope from the c apartment street bank to the c apartment street bank.

In this case, a person engaged in driving business shall not make a U.S. internship at a place other than the zone where the U.S. is permitted, and there was a duty of care to inform other drivers of the direction of the change by using direction etc., and to change the lanes safely by considering the situation of traffic on the left and right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the front part of the EKakn Roon which the victim D (Nam, 55 years old), who was driving in a normal situation by the negligence of changing the Akin line into a one-lane, was driven by the driver's seat of the said vehicle.

The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained spawn spawnosiss, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and even though the spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn swn

[200 Highest 1088]

1. On September 30, 2018, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F by phone call from the victim F at a non-permanent place (i.e., 17:00 on September 30, 2018).

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use the money received from the victim as the drinking value, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim because he did not have any occupation at the time and did not receive money.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the victim as above.

arrow