A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2013, the Defendant: (a) was removed from, and kept in custody for the purpose of uttering at the Daar-gu Seoul Southern apartment parking lot, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) the Defendant illegally used the number plate, which was attached to the Datop 100cc Katoba, for a new purchase of the number plate.

2. At around 10:25 on September 30, 2013, the Defendant exercised the air defense that was illegally used by the Defendant, who operated the above e-mail fluor, with the number plate attached on the front street of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

3. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the defendant are those engaged in driving the above stipllers.

Around 10:25 September 30, 2013, the Defendant driving the aforesaid C-Plus Oba, and proceeded with one lane of the five-lane roads in the front direction of the Seoul Northern-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, as the front direction of the road from the front direction of the city.

The Defendant got to turn to the left after receiving a left-hand turn turn signal according to the G Dap car of the victim F(28 years old) driving. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to look at the preceding vehicle in order to ensure that the preceding vehicle is proceeding, etc., and to first proceed with the preceding vehicle in order to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the defendant tried to turn to the left over the center line to proceed ahead of the above car that he want to make a U-turn, and the left part of the above car was shocked with the front right part of the O-Top.

The Defendant caused the victim by occupational negligence to suffer from a scopical scopical scopical scopty which requires treatment of approximately two weeks, and damaged the said car to cover the repair cost of KRW 1,031,576.

4. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the foregoing e-mail which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (3).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;