Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

No certified architect shall allow another person to provide an architectural service by using his/her name, or lend his/her qualification certificate to another person.

Nevertheless, on October 2014, the Defendant received delivery of KRW 5 million from Architect, construction Brer H from the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, for the construction supervision of the construction work of the building work by using the Defendant’s name (hereinafter “instant building”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of each part of the witness G and H in the second public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of G to the prosecution;

1. Application for building permission, contract for construction supervision, supervision report, placement report, etc. (the defendant and defense counsel only prepare a supervision report with the help of the G, and have conducted supervision directly;

The argument is asserted.

According to each of the above evidence and each of the evidence submitted by the defense counsel, the following facts are as follows: ① The construction drawings of the building of this case are to be constructed free of fire, and ② G and H are as follows: (a) the construction process in the supervision completion report is legitimate; (b) the facts charged that the construction process was completed in the supervision report; and (c) the facts charged by the Defendant’s architect’s act of conducting supervision using the Defendant’s architect’s name; and (d) the judgment became final and conclusive (the Incheon District Court 2016 High Court case No. 7493 case; and the building of this case, other than the building of this case, were also sentenced to the same content in relation to the construction of other buildings; and (e) G and H were led to confession

② G did not have any indication in the process of the prosecutor’s investigation that it was built as the favorable fire, and it was doubtful that the system was not the favorable fire because the system was built, such as the printing of the favorable fire in glass itself, and the system was not the favorable fire.