logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.01.17 2018고정2472
저작권법위반
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is an internal director of the corporation B, and Defendant B is a corporation that manufactures intelligent vehicle electric equipment and parts from the sixth floor of the building C in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City. A.

Defendant

A around July 2018, the Defendant infringed on the copyright of the said copyright holder by arbitrarily reproducing and using a “E” program work owned by D’s company on a computer in an unsound manner.

B. Although Defendant B, a inside director, infringed copyright as above on Defendant’s business, Defendant B did not exercise due care and supervision to prevent such infringement.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act (Defendant A), Articles 141 and 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act (Defendant B);

(b) Offenses subject to prosecution: Article 140 of the Copyright Act.

C. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: Submission of a written agreement on December 26, 2018 to the effect that the injured party’s agent will revoke his/her complaint to the Defendants to this court on December 26, 2018, after the institution of this case

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow