logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.07 2015고단6207
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 05:00 on August 31, 2015, the Defendant asked a person who sent a text message “D” 504, the Defendant’s residence of the Defendant, and “D” 504, a female-child job-friendly victim E (here 41 years old), which was received as his/her mobile phone, to the victim, for the reason that the victim would make a false statement, used the victim’s face (17cm in length, 10cm in length, 10cm in day), which is a dangerous thing for the victim’s hand on the ground that he/she would make a false statement, and she embling both sides of the victim with the victim’s face and part of his/her face when the victim’s face and part of the body can not be known about the number of days of treatment, such as cruel, joints on the back part, and boom, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning a crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the scope of recommended punishment] Habitual injury, repeated crime injury, and special injury in the mitigated area (i.e., type 1 (Habitual injury, repeated crime injury, special injury) (i.e., June 2 to 6) (i., June 1), minor injury (a person subject to special mitigation] / the victim and injury are relatively minor; (ii) there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine for the same crime; and (iii) there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine for the same crime; and (iv) the fact that the crime of this case is seriously contradictory to the crime of

arrow