logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.18 2018나69403
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

On April 14, 2015, 04:50, 04:50 is located in the area of the Suwon-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The grounds for this Court’s liability for damages are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Supplementary Use】

A. The 4th to 5th of the first instance judgment shall be raised as follows. The 4th of the first instance judgment, the 5th of the 4th to 3th of the 5th.

In full view of the facts acknowledged earlier, Gap's evidence Nos. 2 and 4 (including the serial number) and the purport of the entire pleadings, Eul, a driver of the plaintiff vehicle, caused the first accident of this case due to negligence such as violation of the duty of the front-time watch, etc., which caused the plaintiff's vehicle to stop without routing it over the second-lanes. D's failure to take safety measures after the accident, and the third vehicle driving the plaintiff's vehicle driving the first accident at the point of the first accident of this case without taking the safety measures as above. The third vehicle driving the vehicle of this case at the same time without taking the first accident of this case. The defendant's vehicle following the third vehicle at the first lane of this time did not reduce the speed and caused the second accident of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion that the second accident of this case could not be accepted prior to the plaintiff's negligence and the first accident of this case, the second accident of this case, and the second accident of this case, even if there was no time or there was no sufficient reason for the plaintiff's negligence.

B. The fifth and sixth instances of the judgment of the court of first instance stated that the surface was milked at night, and the defendant also raised.

arrow