The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant B and C shall be reversed, respectively.

Defendant

B B Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, Defendant C.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court to Defendant A (a 3 years of imprisonment and fine of KRW 20,000,000, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence sentenced by the lower court to Defendant B and C (Defendant B: one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor; three years of suspended execution; and two years of suspended execution with prison labor in October) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the Defendant A’s assertion, Defendant A made a confession of all of the crimes of this case in the original trial and the original trial court, and the Defendant A divided his mistake in depth.

The statement is made, and the victims of the crimes of conflict between Defendant A and Defendant A as stated in the original judgment, and the facts constituting the crime No. 1-C. as stated in the original judgment.

The following facts are that the victim of the crime of fraud described in paragraph (1) has reached an agreement with the AP and the victim expressed his/her intention that the victim does not want to punish the defendant A, that the defendant did not have the same criminal record, that there was no criminal record of imprisonment without labor or heavier punishment, and that the social relationship between the defendant A and the victim appears obvious.

On the other hand, each of the crimes of this case committed by Defendant A, as a public official of the I military administration (police assigned to special guard) of the I military, shall receive 50,200,000 won in total from 21 persons related to interests including Defendant B to 29 times as a bribe with regard to the control of illegal construction activities and the imposition of compulsory performance within his own unmanned development restriction zone, etc. as a public official of the I military administration, and with the same background as described in paragraph (a) of this case, the victim AI, AL, AM, N, and AO using his status to commit each of the crimes of conflict (15,00,000 won in total) as described in paragraph (b) of the above crime, and the victim P and AZ against the victim.

A. Paragraphs 4 and 4-A. Each fraud (a total amount of damage 30 million won) as described in the above paragraph is committed, and further committing the above crime No. 4

(b).

Up to each crime of forging an official document, such as the entry in the paragraph, and of uttering a forged official document.