1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Jeonju District Court served a certified copy of the instant performance recommendation decision (2013Gais 99047) (2013) on the Defendant’s residence, Jeonju-si C (hereinafter “instant domicile”) but did not serve as a closed door on October 31, 2013.

B. On November 4, 2013, the Defendant visited this Court and received a certified copy of the said recommendations, and submitted a written objection and written response on November 5, 2013, the following day.

C. On January 28, 2014, the court of first instance served a notice of the first date of pleading on the Defendant’s domicile at the instant domicile, but sent the notice on February 5, 2014 on February 11, 2014, which was not served due to the absence of a closed door.

The Defendant was present at the date for the first pleading of the instant case, which was in progress pursuant to 10:40 on March 20, 2014, and was notified by the presiding judge of the first instance court on the date for the second pleading of April 17, 2014, the date for the third pleading of May 22, 2014, the date for the fourth pleading of July 3, 2014, the date for the fourth pleading of July 31, 2014, and the fifth pleading of July 31, 2014. The date for the first instance judgment of the instant case was notified by the presiding judge of the first instance court of “0 on September 4, 2014.”

E. On September 4, 2014, the court of first instance rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff while the Defendant was absent on September 14, 2014, and rendered a service of the original of the judgment to the address of this case, but did not serve the original of the judgment due to the absence of closure, issued an order of service by public notice on September 19, 2014, and simultaneously served the original of the judgment by public notice.

On December 10, 2014, after the expiration of 14 days from October 7, 2014, the Defendant visited this court and received the judgment, and filed the instant appeal for subsequent completion on the same day.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, substantial facts in this court

2. The phrase “reasons for which a party cannot be held liable” under Article 173(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, as to the legitimacy of the appeal of the instant case, is generally required for the parties to conduct procedural acts.