The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (three months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: although the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflects the defendant's mistake; the victim of the crime of destruction is recognized as being agreed with the victim and the victimized police officer, the defendant committed the crime of this case despite the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he was under suspension of execution due to a special injury; the defendant committed the crime of this case more than twice; the defendant used violence against the police officer who has worn the uniform; there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, economic situation, circumstances and motive leading to the crime of this case; and all other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, the defendant's punishment of the court below is deemed appropriate, and the defendant's assertion is without merit

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.