Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who was the chairperson of the election management of Gwangju Northern-gu C Apartment.

At around January 21, 2016, the Defendant, at the above apartment 805 Dong, attached on the bulletin board of the above apartment, stated that “The election of the representative of the victim C apartment election commission for each Dong under the name of the chairperson of the Dong, which belongs to the illegal advertisement and illegal broadcast. The election of the Dong representative of the apartment is decided on February 15, 201. There is a trial as to this case by the election led by D, E, and F. The representative G of occupants and the chairman of the election management commission, which included the contents of “A”, attached a yellow Stick for each Dong, thereby impairing the utility of the notice of the election of the representative of each Dong, which is a document.

In addition, the defendant from around that time to the same year

2. From the date of 15. up to the date of 15.0, as shown in the attached list of crimes, a boiler was posted in the public notice, such as a door of appeal, and the document was made effective.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. The Defendant asserts that the notice of the election of the representative of each Dong, the notice of the election commission, the notice of the holding of a visiting voting, the public notice of the election of the representative of each Dong, the public notice of the election of the representative of each Dong, the public notice of the re-election, the public notice of the elected representative, the public notice of the elected representative, and the public notice of the election of the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives, in order to inform that the contents of

However, in full view of the above evidence, the Defendant recognized that he had not been the chairman of the election management at the time of committing the instant crime by legitimately withdrawing from the office of the chairman of the election management around November 19, 2015. Even if there was a dispute over the validity of the said surrender declaration, it is hard to view that there was a legal dispute over the contents of the public notice, such as the above appeal and appeal posted by D and E.