A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2015, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) on August 20, 2015, at a restaurant substantially operated by the victim C in Pyeongtaek-si B, the Defendant told the Defendant that the victim was under the influence of alcohol; (b) attempted to mislead the Defendant, and (c) prevented the Defendant from entering the restaurant for about one hour by getting a disturbance for approximately one hour.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant received 112 reports that the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph (1) and received statements from the police officer E belonging to the Pyeongtaek Police Station that called out after having received such reports.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while putting a bath, threatened the above police officers with a physical disease on the cafeteria of the restaurant, threatened him with a softener, left a brue on the table, and threatened him with the brush of the brue of the above police officers on the brue, and threatened him with the face of the above police officers on the ground of a brush which continued to brush the brue.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public order and crime prevention.

3. The Defendant, at around 01:00 on August 20, 2015, arrested a flagrant offender for obstruction of performance of official duties and obstruction of performance of official duties and was subject to investigation.

In the meantime, the Defendant expressed the victim F, who is a police officer, to the majority of the police officers and civil petitioners, that “I am, I am well, I am frily, I amfly, I amfly, I amfly, in accordance with the principle, and thrown away a box, I amfly, I amfly, I amb off, I amfly, in accordance with the cambling gys, gys, and M16 small guns. I ambly, I am to the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of C and E;

1. A written statement;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes to the video closures