The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant (e.g., a fine of 1.5 million won) by the court below is unreasonable.

2. We examine the following facts: (a) the Defendant made confession of the instant crime and recognized his mistake; (b) the instant crime is in a concurrent relationship between the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, which became final and conclusive on February 15, 2013, and the crime of this case under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of obstruction of official duties; (c) such circumstance appears to have been fully considered in the sentencing of the lower court, which reduced the claim amount of the summary order; (d) the Defendant had several records of punishment for violent crimes; (c) the instant crime was committed with the police officer who was in charge of performing official duties; (d) the nature of the crime was not negligible; (e) there was no agreement with the victimized police officer; (e) there was no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be considered in the new sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; and (e) there is no other special circumstance or circumstance that there is no reason to believe that the Defendant’s punishment is unreasonable or unreasonable, by comprehensively taking account of all the sentencing conditions of the instant crime

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.