logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.05.30 2014고단879 (1)
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as C representative director Co., Ltd., employs five full-time workers and engages in construction business, and as a result, D, other than the constructor, is an immediate contractor who subcontracted the light quantity construction among the new construction works of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E, Seoul, and is jointly and severally liable to pay the wages of workers related to D’s light

D From February 27, 2013 to June 27, 2013, it is working on the spot.

The retirement F’s total wage of KRW 6,10,00 for three retired workers including KRW 1,250,000 in May 2013, and KRW 2,150,000 in June wage of KRW 90,00 in total, and KRW 2,150,000 in addition to the individual’s statement of unpaid money and valuables, respectively, did not pay KRW 6,110,000 in total for 14 days from each retirement date without any agreement between the parties on

2. The facts charged are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 44-2 of the Labor Standards Act, which are crimes of non-compliance under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act. Since it is apparent in the record that the victims have withdrawn all their intent to punish the Defendant on May 21, 2014, after the institution of the instant indictment, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow