logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.06.29 2016고정514
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2014, the Defendant is a person elected as the chairperson of the management body of the management body of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the victim C is a representative director of D (ju) who was managing the relevant officetel from March 1, 2010 (the term of the contract is until February 28, 2016).

On July 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) notified the victim of the termination of the above “B” contract on July 23, 2015; and (b) concluded the above contract with the new controlled entity (State E (F) (the representative director:F); (c) the victim was not lawfully elected; and thus, (d) the Defendant did not have the right to terminate the contract.

As above, the defendant did not transfer the above (E) E-management work, while disputing the validity of the above termination notice, and did not transfer the management office that was managed by the injured person, and did not use the above management office by occupying the above management office.

On September 1, 2015, at the management office of the above “B” around 09:30 on September 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) made use of the gap in the office of the above officetel management; (b) went into the above office after the key business operator was removed from the entrance of the management office; and (c) intruded into the said office; and (d) entered the written indictment for sharing all the owners classified by the victim B as “victim”; (c) however, the foregoing corrective device falls under the section for common use of B, and belongs to the sharing

must be viewed.

The market price was destroyed by removing the unexploit correction device and replacing it with a new correction device, and the above (State) E occupied the above management office together with F, the representative director of the E, and prevented G, the director of the management office appointed by the victim, from entering the above office.

As a result, the Defendant intruded on the above management office, which is a building managed by the injured party, damaged the corrective devices in the market price, which is the victim's ownership, and damaged the property of the office as above.

arrow