1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the ground that the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance additionally determines the assertion that the defendant needs to be newly admitted in

[Supplementary or additional parts] The following facts shall be added to the two cases below the second instance judgment, and the two cases below shall be deemed to be f., and the three-party five cases shall be deemed to be f., and the three-party five cases shall be f., respectively.

A person shall be appointed.

E. While the Defendant received and retained the aforementioned KRW 800 million to his/her own account, around January 14, 2016, the Defendant subscribed to a pension insurance policy of Samsung Life Insurance Co., Ltd., and donated the remainder of KRW 400 million to E, F, and G each amount of KRW 50 million around January 21, 2016, and the same year.

2. A loan of KRW 100 million to his/her relatives H around 29. Around the same year;

4.4. Around around around the time, it was used to disburse KRW 150 million with vehicle purchase costs, etc.

Following the second instance judgment of the first instance court, a loan of KRW 400 million for pension insurance KRW 400 million is added.

3. A evidence No. 7 of the first instance judgment No. 7 of "A" and a document prepared ex post by D attorney-at-law, the plaintiff's representative, obtained a certificate of seal imprint and a certificate of seal imprint to the defendant, and then arranged and supplemented the contents of the instant agreement at his office.

The term "domination" is changed.

The third 7-8-party litigation in the first instance court is pending in the appellate court.

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Reu23267 decided that the appellate court did not withdraw the lawsuit and did not claim a division of property on the grounds of reversal of de facto marital relations in the future.

“The ruling of recommending reconciliation was confirmed and terminated.”

"Ero-friendly".

The following facts shall be added to the third 8 pages of the first instance judgment:

A person shall be appointed.

H. The defendant was paid from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation.