1. The defendant 232,427,89 won to the plaintiff Eul, 185,475,026 won to the plaintiff Eul, 163,34,543 won to the plaintiff Eul, and 155.

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Defendant is the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Association established on June 27, 2007 with the approval of the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “head of the Gu”) on June 27, 2007 for the implementation of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement Project”) located in the area of 3, 136,310 square meters in Seongdong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant rearrangement Project”). The Plaintiffs are the owners of each land indicated as “owned” on the following table within the instant rearrangement Project Zone (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case,” and the individual land is specified as parcel number).

Plaintiff A’s land owned by Plaintiff A, Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 579С, Plaintiff B, H 192С and I 165С, Plaintiff CJ JJ 271С, Plaintiff D K-79С, and Plaintiff E, Plaintiff E with 203С of 291С of the same Gu, Plaintiff E with 301С of 291С of the same Gu.

B. On October 12, 2007, the Defendant received the authorization from the head of the Gu to implement the instant rearrangement project, and the head of the Gu publicly notified the authorization by the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice No. 2007-83 on October 15, 2007.

C. The defendant, on October 16, 2007, publicly announced the application for parcelling-out as to the rearrangement project of this case on November 14, 2007, received the application for parcelling-out from that time to November 14, 2007, and the plaintiffs applied for parcelling-out to the defendant within the above period for parcelling-out.

Plaintiff

A around November 4, 2008, around December 15, 2008, Plaintiff F submitted a document to the effect that, around December 22, 2008, Plaintiff C consents to withdrawal of the previous application for parcelling-out and receipt of cash settlement. Around February 23, 2009, Plaintiff C consented to withdrawal of the previous application for parcelling-out and receipt of cash settlement.

E. The remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff A sent a written request for an application for adjudication of expropriation to the defendant on each date stated below, and each of the above written requests was served to the defendant on each date stated in the "service date" column as follows. Meanwhile, the defendant on March 12, 2010.