beta
Text
1. The defendant is in Jeju City G within the business hours from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. to the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship between the parties is a clan that is composed of descendants of the defendant's clans that set H rice sleeps in the Joseon Dynasty as a joint vessel. The plaintiffs are members of the defendant's clans Association, the plaintiffs are the 11-year-old descendants of I, who are the 10-year-old descendants of I, and the defendant's clans Association that was selected as the follow-up descendants of J, the 10-year-old descendants of I.
B. Defendant Jong-dong Association’s claim for ownership transfer registration against Plaintiff A, etc. (1) Defendant Jong-dong Association’s clan on May 17, 2006 and Plaintiff A and K, L, M, N, andO (hereinafter “Plaintiff A, etc.”).
2) On the part of Jeju District Court 2006Gahap1233, Jeju District Court 2006, and 11 lots of land, such as P tree 1,487 m2, P tree 1,487 m2, etc. (hereinafter “instant land”).
(2) On February 8, 2007, the lower court rendered a judgment on February 8, 2007 that “K, L, M, N, andO shall implement the procedure for the transfer of ownership on each of the instant land ownership and dismissed the claim against the Plaintiff of the lower court for the claim against the Plaintiff of the lower court on the ground that the title trust agreement was terminated.” The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking implementation of the procedure for the transfer of ownership on the ground that the title trust agreement was terminated.
3) As to this, the defendant clan-friendly association and L, M, N, andO appealed respectively from the Gwangju High Court Decision 2008Na2325 on August 13, 2008. The Gwangju High Court rendered a judgment on August 13, 2008 that "the part against the plaintiff among the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff A shall implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership based on the termination of title trust as of May 26, 2006 with respect to each one-half portion of the land of this case, and all appeals of L, M, N, andO shall be dismissed," and the plaintiff A appealed from the Supreme Court Decision 2008Da66894 on November 13, 2008.