logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.11 2013가합70076
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 278,571,429 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 142,857,142 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 68,571,429 to Plaintiff E and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 7, 1977, the judgment of conviction against the Plaintiff A and the conviction against the Plaintiff A 1) The Plaintiff’s emergency measures for the national security and the protection of public order (hereinafter “emergency measures No. 9”) are deemed to be taken on November 7, 197.

around that time, the Seoul Criminal Court was arrested as a violation of the Act, 77 Gohap877, and the facts charged were charged in the attached Form.

1. Entry of the offense;

(2) On February 1, 1978, the above court found the plaintiff A guilty of the violation of the Emergency Measure No. 1, and sentenced one year of imprisonment and one year of suspension of qualification. 3) The plaintiff A appealed against the above judgment as Seoul High Court 78No388, but the appellate court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on June 23, 1978, and the plaintiff A filed an appeal as Supreme Court Decision 78Do1884 on September 26, 1978, but the Supreme Court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on September 26, 1978, and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

(hereinafter the above final judgment (hereinafter referred to as the “final judgment of this case”). 4 Plaintiff A was tried for a violation of Emergency Decree No. 1, and was detained in the Seoul detention center, while being tried for a violation of Emergency Decree No. 1.

2. Publicly slandering Emergency Measure No. 9, such as those described in paragraphs 1 through 4 of this Article, and after being transferred to an official prison on July 1, 1978, the attached Form

2. The facts charged that patently slandered Emergency Measure No. 9, such as the 5 and 6 of the violation (hereinafter referred to as “the facts of the violation of Emergency Measure No. 2”) were charged as Daejeon District Court 78Da189, 79 Gohap9 (Joint).

5. On April 20, 1979, the above court sentenced one year and one year of qualification suspension to the facts constituting the crime listed in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this case among the facts of violation of Emergency Decree No. 2 of this case, and one year and six months of imprisonment and one year of qualification suspension to the facts constituting the crime listed in paragraphs (5) and (6) from among the facts of violation of Emergency Decree No. 2 of this case. The plaintiff appealed from the above judgment and withdrawn the appeal.

arrow