Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Damage to property;
A. On May 31, 2018, the Defendant destroyed the 905,000 won of repair cost by destroying the E-to-land owned by the victim, which was parked in the same place without any justifiable reason, during the period of the 02:40 on May 31, 2018, the Defendant, who committed the crime against the victim B, in front of the Gu C building, was fluoring with D in the street, in excess of the E-to-land owned by the victim.
B. The Defendant committed the crime against the Victim F with the victim damage to the victim’s G Obaul, etc., which was parked at the above time and place without any justifiable reason, by damaging the 130,000 won of the repair cost by exceeding the G Obaul owned by the victim.
C. The Defendant, at the above time and place, destroyed the victim H by facing the victim’s string part of the International Berne Vessel’s car owned by the victim, which was parked next to the said G M&A, with approximately KRW 6.30,000,000 of the repair cost.
2. The Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties, at the same time and place as above, listen to the statement that the Defendant was sloping K and patrolmen belonging to the police station police box, who received a report from the male and female salute, and during his/her dispatch, he/she sought to present an identification card to verify the Defendant’s personal information after hearing the testimony from D that the Defendant was salute in excess of the above salute, and without any justifiable reason, he/she saluted the salute part of the slope K one time in salute, took his/her salute to the salute part of the K’s salute, and kept the salute to go to D.
In other words, the left hand of the slope K one time on the side of the ship of the slope K, and the defendant's personal information was continuously verified, and the relation between the chest and the ship of the slope K one time.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of a police official to the field.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement to K;
1. A H statement;
1. A report on investigation (an investigation into the appearance, etc. of a suspect taken at the site);
1. The victim H.