beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 70,463,747 as well as 5% per annum from February 21, 2018 to September 20, 2019.
Reasons
1. In preparation for the public notice of appointment of teachers, Defendant B, while preparing for the public notice of appointment of teachers, prepared money using loan companies, bonds, etc., but failed to repay this money, thereby inducing the interest to acquire money by deceiving another person who is still not infinite;
On January 2016, Defendant B made a false statement that “When supporting the D Council, the D Council would be able to give 10% of the principal and support amount sponsored in the following month as additional dues” while making a telephone call with the Defendant, Defendant B made a false statement.
However, in fact, even if Defendant B received money from the Plaintiff as a donation, it was thought that it would be used as his debt repayment and living expenses, and there was no additional charge from D Academic Association to collect the donation. Therefore, it is obvious that if Defendant B continued to receive the donation from the Plaintiff, it would result in the situation that the additional charge would not be paid, and the principal would not be paid.
Defendant B, as such, by deceiving the Plaintiff, received KRW 50,00,00 from the Plaintiff on January 23, 2016 to the Defendant C’s bank account, the spouse, and acquired 550,170,000 from that time to February 10, 2018 by deceiving the Plaintiff through the transfer of KRW 50,170,00 in total to the Defendant C’s account.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the parties' arguments
A. Defendant B, by deceiving the Plaintiff and deceiving the money as a support payment, did not return 61,03,000 won. The Plaintiff suffered from severe mental damage equivalent to KRW 11,973,261 and KRW 9,460,910 due to the termination of the insurance contract and KRW 11,973,261, which was repaid in advance for the purpose of supporting the Plaintiff. Even if Defendant B’s liability for damages is not recognized, Defendant B is not refunded.