Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around 19:50 on June 17, 2018, the Defendant was carrying a vehicle on the street in front of the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo Police Station E District, Mapo-gu, Seoul, with another person and the Defendant’s wife, along with the earth. After receiving a report, the Defendant’s wife was accompanied to the earth, and the police officers belonging to the said district would keep highness and desire to keep in the earth, and control the F of the police officers belonging to the said district, and “I am, I am saw, am dead, dead, dead, dead, and dead at the end of the earth, I am saw in front of the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E District Police Station, and am under the influence of drinking on the earth, am under the influence of drinking, and interfere with the maintenance of order and order of the police officers to prevent the occurrence of a crime, such as obstruction of the performance of their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation report, investigation report, and investigation report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing tear-free photographs, destroyed drinking-free photographs, damaged screen pictures, color photographs where the person under consideration dnife sobed, face pictures of which the person under consideration assaults a police officer, and video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes governing official performance;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there is no particular criminal history other than the one-time fine prior to the sentencing of this Chapter, and that all of his errors are recognized, etc. are favorable to the defendant. Meanwhile, the extent of the assault committed by the defendant is not less narrowly, and the degree of the assault committed by the defendant was considerably excessive, and the defendant repeats his assertion that there was a problem in the performance of duties by the police officer until this Court reaches this Court, and thus, it is a question that his mistake is seriously against the defendant.