logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.08 2016나3228
소유권이전등기말소등기절차이행
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. The first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is all dismissed because it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, all appeals against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. The part of the claim of the judgment of the court of first instance "the registration of creation of superficies that was completed on May 19, 2009 by the above registry office No. 9345" is "the registration of creation of superficies that was completed on May 19, 2009 by the above registry office No. 9344 of the above registry office and the registration of creation of superficies that was completed on May 19, 2009 by the above registry office No. 9344 of the above registry office, it is obvious that the registration of establishment of neighboring mortgage and the registration of creation of superficies that were completed on May 19, 2009 by the above registry office

arrow