Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 670,167 as well as its annual rate from August 19, 2016 to August 21, 2018, and the next day.
Reasons
1.The following facts of recognition may be found in the absence of dispute between the parties, or may be found in full view of each description or image of Gap evidence 1 to 16, and Eul evidence 1 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the commission to the appraiser C by the appraiser C of this Court, and the whole purport of the arguments.
The plaintiff is a person who is engaged in the manufacture, wholesale, etc. of textile products with the trade name of "D", and the defendant is a person who engages in the original dye color processing business with the trade name of "E".
Since 2012, the Plaintiff has requested the Defendant to do chromosome processing.
B. On July 12, 2014, the Plaintiff, who was in charge of the processing of poly-pickers (G) to be supplied to F on July 12, 2014, on July 30, 2014, was in charge of processing to the Defendant on July 30, 2014. However, there was a defect such as Finle, pollution, chrographing, etc. in the original part
C. As the Plaintiff supplied to F but failed to receive the price, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the price of goods with the Seo-gu District Court Branch Decision 2015Da23417, Apr. 27, 2016, and sentenced F to the said court to pay KRW 39,86,650 and damages for delay.
On April 2015, the Plaintiff used the original unit (H and I) processing to export to China to China, and input the birth site.
Specifically, on April 22, 2015, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with 1,000y dynas for test processing, the Plaintiff decided to change the density from 150T to 142T upon a Chinese buyer’s request for change, and supplied 23,797y dynas on May 8, 2015.
However, as a defect occurred in the processing site, such as cooling Si and Maura, the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant on June 8, 2015, and additionally input 24,151yd the total growth area after June 11, 2015.
E. From July 2015, the Plaintiff exported to China 18,288yd 19,934yd chrofe processing 19,934yd, which was supplied by the Defendant until July 2015, the entirety quantity of the raw chrofeing 16,401yd chrofe that was supplied by the Defendant.