(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.02.13 2011고정5063

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.02.13 2011고정5063

명예훼손등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

A. On July 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment due to property damage, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 13, 2012.

The defendant of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 201 High Court 5063 is a person who operates a cafeteria from the second floor of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

From January 29, 201 to May 20, 2011, the Defendant: (a) on the wall of the second floor C’s corridor, “case: Lawsuit for invalidation of the general assembly resolution of 2010Na79130; (b) the Plaintiff: E, A, and the Defendant; and (c) C: the manager elected by the management body; (c) on January 29, 201, the convening authority of the management body under the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings is the Plaintiff; (b) the date and time of the assembly shall be the end of February 2011; and (c) the agenda shall be the appointment of the management body and the enactment of the management body regulations. The Defendants notify sectional owners of the agenda item two weeks prior to the date and time of the assembly; (c) the Defendants are not obliged to take any measure against the store occupied by the time of the assembly resolution; (d) the notice of convening the general assembly is attached to the Plaintiff.”

However, in a lawsuit for invalidation of the Seoul High Court resolution 2010Na79130, which was brought against the victim by the victim, the victim F did not include the mediation that the victim was not a manager elected by the management body of the management body of the management body of the management body of the management body of the management body of the 2010Na79130, and the C commercial Code does not include the fact that the victim F does not take a single measure until the resolution of the management body meeting of the sectional owners, but did not include the fact that the C commercial Code does not take a single measure, but did not take a single measure for all other stores, it stated it falsely as stated in the purport that he does not take a single measure for all stores.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by pointing out the aforementioned false facts, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

"2012, 1602".

참조조문

-집합건물의 소유 및 관리에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.15 2014고정5682

-서울동부지방법원 2020.02.07 2018나28640

-서울동부지방법원 2016.10.28 2016나25043

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.01.10 2016가단118082

-창원지방법원 2014.09.19 2014고정311