A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 22:40 on May 5, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 22:40, the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Party (Seoul Jongno-gu) expressed desire to the president to move to the Cheongdaedaedae, while under the influence of alcohol, he tried to resist to the president while intending to move to the king by a large sound; and (b) was prevented from the police officer working at the guard, and was faced with any disturbance, the Defendant was prevented from moving from the police officer of the Seoul Guro-gu Police Station C commander of the police station, who was dispatched after receiving a 112 report that “the principal is going to the king; (c) he was urged to go to the king; and (d) he was able to have the left part of the above police officer one time by hand; and (d) he was tightly sealed by the police officer with his hand, by taking one time, by taking into account the left part of the police officer’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of the 112 reported case by the police officer, protection of people's lives, bodies, and property, prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of the crime.

『2020고단4250』 피고인은 2020. 5. 26. 23:10경 서울 종로구 E 앞길에서 술에 취하여 큰 소리로 B 대통령에 대해 욕을 하면서 대통령에게 항의하기 위해 청와대 정문 쪽으로 이동하던 중 그곳에서 경비 근무 중이던 서울지방경찰청 F 소속 G 경감으로부터 신분증을 제시할 것과 귀가할 것을 권유받자 화가 나, “야 이 씹쌔야. 이리와봐.”라고 욕설하며 손으로 위 G의 몸을 수회 때리고, 손으로 위 G의 낭심 부분을 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' guard duties and prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

[200 Highest 3889]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Copies of the public official identification;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not assault police officers.

However, damaged police officers and ...