1. Of the instant lawsuit, the mortgage created on September 8, 201 in the register of motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet among the instant lawsuit.

1. Indication of Claim: The portion of Claim No. 3.3 was withdrawn among the grounds for Claim No. 1 in the separate sheet.

same as the entry.

2. Judgment by public notice: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. We examine ex officio the determination on the legitimacy of the lawsuit for the confirmation of the obligation to pay the secured debt and the fine for negligence in the part of the lawsuit for the confirmation of the obligation to pay a fine for negligence, and the interest of confirmation in the lawsuit for confirmation is recognized as the case where there is a dispute between the parties as to the legal relationship, and the judgment of confirmation is the most effective and appropriate means when the plaintiff's legal status is at risk

Attached Form

On September 8, 2011, the register of automobiles entered in the list, a judgment is rendered to the effect that the Defendant has the obligation to repay the secured obligation of the mortgage established on September 8, 201, and the said judgment does not affect the creditors other than the parties (in light of the data submitted by the Plaintiff, the secured creditor of the said mortgage is presumed to be one capital corporation, not the Defendant, and is presumed to be one capital corporation). Thus, the judgment of confirmation cannot be the most effective and appropriate means to eliminate the

In addition, even if a judgment on the purport that the obligation to pay an administrative fine imposed in the name of the plaintiff is imposed on the defendant, the obligation to pay the administrative fine is not transferred to the defendant from the plaintiff, and the above judgment is not effective as a matter of course to the administrative office, not a party to the above judgment. Thus, the above confirmation judgment cannot

Therefore, among the lawsuits in this case, the part of the claim for confirmation of liability for payment, such as the obligation to repay the secured debt of the mortgage established on September 8, 2011 and the obligation for administrative fines, is unlawful.

4. Judgment on the claim for the acquisition of transfer of ownership registration procedures was submitted by the Plaintiff.