The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Criminal facts have to be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, the selection of evidence and probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact-finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court (Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). The lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, convicted all of the criminal facts of the production of child pornography as indicated in the lower judgment.

The allegation in the grounds of appeal disputing the determination of facts that led to such determination by the lower court is merely an error of the lower court’s determination on the selection of evidence and probative value, which belong to the free judgment by the fact-finding court, and even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the aforementioned legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine or exceeding the bounds of the free

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal is permitted for the wrongful grounds for sentencing. Thus, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.